Assurance

["Cantor, Scott" <>]

On 10/31/12 3:04 PM, "Jones, Mark B" 
<>
 wrote:

>Not sure how it defeats the purpose.

I assume the purpose is "use an identity you have now and are comfortable
with". I do not dispute that most people are very happy using Google to do
this.

>  My thought was that if the objection was dealing with a for profit
>corporation then a non-profit that is in the IaaS business might need to
>be encouraged.

I don't think it's possible to really do that top-down, but to the extent
that federation with a lot of options is ruled out, then creating an
artificial option that people like me could choose is at least better than
nothing, yes.

-- Scott