Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

participants-research - Re: IdP discovery - list 'em all?

Subject: InC Research Participants

List archive

Re: IdP discovery - list 'em all?

Chronological Thread 
  • From: Nicholas Roy <>
  • To: "Cantor, Scott" <>, "" <>
  • Subject: Re: IdP discovery - list 'em all?
  • Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 11:17:31 -0600
  • Authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) ;
  • Ironport-phdr: 9a23:pHAimxIMe+BGMYasdNmcpTZWNBhigK39O0sv0rFitYgUIv/xwZ3uMQTl6Ol3ixeRBMOAtKIC1rGd6v2ocFdDyKjCmUhKSIZLWR4BhJdetC0bK+nBN3fGKuX3ZTcxBsVIWQwt1Xi6NU9IBJS2PAWK8TWapAQfERTnNAdzOv+9WsuL15z2hNac9JHrRCAAxGfkIOA6EBLj5y7YsNURm88qEa021geD6i9DcuJKwnkuf3qUhAu668utqtoruTxZoe4g/M9YWKPmZOEiQKdVBS4tM0g04sbssBzES02I/HRWGjEOmwBUAgPE9Bj8Qoy0qCbhu+Nn0ymyPMv9SrUxXjLk6L1kHkzGkiACYhg4+2HQjsVrxJhcsVr1oQZ40qbVZp2YLvxzYvmbcN8HEzkSFv1NXjBMV9vvJ7AECPAMaKME/oQ=
  • Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
  • Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99

On 9/15/16 11:13 AM, Cantor, Scott wrote:
Scott, should we add this to an upcoming TAC agenda?
Dunno if it's a TAC item or just something this emerging group should make
recommendations on. Just saying that the federation itself ought to at some
point make participants aware of the implications of being a member. As you
said, knowing the thought process behind this would help focus attention on
the right issue(s).

Thanks, good suggestions, and this is probably a good way for this group to establish its mode of request delivery into InCommon governance. Let me know if you have questions about how best to go about that.


-- Scott

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page