Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

participants-research - Re: IdP discovery - list 'em all?

Subject: InC Research Participants

List archive

Re: IdP discovery - list 'em all?


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Cantor, Scott" <>
  • To: "Basney, Jim" <>, "" <>
  • Subject: Re: IdP discovery - list 'em all?
  • Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 19:31:09 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 164.107.81.212) smtp.mailfrom=osu.edu; illinois.edu; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;illinois.edu; dmarc=bestguesspass action=none header.from=osu.edu;
  • Ironport-phdr: 9a23:W4p1/hF9BZvzMoh0nKf3EJ1GYnF86YWxBRYc798ds5kLTJ75oMiwAkXT6L1XgUPTWs2DsrQf1LqQ7vurADFIyK3CmU5BWaQEbwUCh8QSkl5oK+++Imq/EsTXaTcnFt9JTl5v8iLzG0FUHMHjew+a+SXqvnY6Uy/yPgttJ+nzBpWaz4Huj7jzqNXvZFACrjOmZ75jaF2UrACb/p0Ui4J5LKsg4hrNpnpOfOVNg25kOATX11zk792s/ZVi6y1Wp+lk7cNbXKzgdKQQTLpTCzEjNGZz49fk/1GXVQKV+noXU30flAZTRhLI9xzzRJzxmir8ve143S6ce8rsQuZndy6l6vIhYxbulCAdc3YC+2bLloY42KlSpg6mvVol64nPfceYOOcoLfCVRs8TWWcUBpUZbCdGGI7pKtJXV+c=
  • Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
  • Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
On 9/1/16, 3:26 PM,
"
on behalf of Basney, Jim"
<
on behalf of
>
wrote:

> My summary of the IGTF consensus is that 1) the eduGAIN agreements are
> weaker than the InCommon Participation Agreement and 2) eduGAIN IdPs are
> "more distant" in terms of dealing with security incidents (e.g., we might
> need to involve operators of multiple federations), and (self-asserted)
> R&S and Sirtfi compliance provides a compensating control for the added
> risks of #1 and #2.

Ok, that helps, thanks. It will be interesting to see in practice how much
InCommon membership actually makes a difference in the areas touched by
Sirtfi without an actual affirmative statement of compliance with it.

-- Scott




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page