Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

participants-research - Re: IdP discovery - list 'em all?

Subject: InC Research Participants

List archive

Re: IdP discovery - list 'em all?

Chronological Thread 
  • From: Nicholas Roy <>
  • To: <>
  • Subject: Re: IdP discovery - list 'em all?
  • Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 11:11:32 -0600
  • Authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) ;
  • Ironport-phdr: 9a23:rYaCBhWEn6Z+wIcldxOEjH0qz+/V8LGtZVwlr6E/grcLSJyIuqrYZR2Ht8tkgFKBZ4jH8fUM07OQ6P+wHzFbqs/c+Fk5M7VyFDY9wf0MmAIhBMPXQWbaF9XNKxIAIcJZSVV+9Gu6O0UGUOz3ZlnVv2HgpWVKQka3AyMueb+wQtKaz5nvlrP6x5qGNx1Bnia8arJqJROqtkDLu9IbiJFpKo4wzBDOp35PfaJR32w+dnyJmBOpwMa7/Jln+j8YgfUwv5pGS6LrV6U+UbFCCjk6aSY46NC95kqLdheG+nZJCjZeqRFPGQWQsUn3
  • Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
  • Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99

On 9/15/16 11:09 AM, Cantor, Scott wrote:
Considering the number of SPs who are using centralized federation-wide
discovery pages where blacklisting isn't an option unless the IdP wants to be
removed from every interaction, this just doesn't make sense to me.
I think we can all agree this is nuts at worst, and likely just confusion at
best, but there's clearly a problem around expectation setting. That probably
is the best place the federation itself can focus its energies.

Needless to say, if somebody asked me to blacklist their IdP from, the answer would be unprintable.

Scott, should we add this to an upcoming TAC agenda?


-- Scott

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page