Discussion of use cases and implementation experience integrating with Workday

[Paul Caskey <>]

+1 - InCommon is much more than metadata.   And there will be more stuff 
coming soon for SPs like Workday.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: 
> 
>  [
> ]
>  On Behalf Of Michael R Gettes
> Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 9:21 AM
> To: 
> 
> Subject: Re: [InC-Workday] workday panel at techex 2016; session proposal?
> 
> Well, to put a fine point on it, I think given where things land right now, 
> our
> ability to change things is approaching zero.  Had recent events not
> happened, we could have convinced Workday of the “InCommon way”
> which would also have been a positive impact on other Workday related
> efforts.  I disagree with the “low value” assessment in that it was never 
> just
> about the metadata.
> 
> /mrg
> 
> > On Mar 11, 2016, at 10:14 AM, Steven Carmody
> <>
>  wrote:
> >
> > I don't want to be too much of a curmudgeon. But, given the required
> effort and the very low value that campuses would get from having Workday
> in the IC metadata (see the recent thread discussing this), why do we want
> to invest much effort in strong-arming Workday ?
> >
> > On 3/9/16 6:42 PM, Nick Roy wrote:
> >> Would this include figuring out how to strong-arm them into getting
> >> religion on joining InCommon?  See: Michael Gettes' note about
> >> Workday's decision to not join.  I guess that's a conversation that
> >> I'd like to see happen sooner than TechEx, but it might be worth
> discussing there, too.
> >>
> >> For what it's worth, I'd be happy to see a workday session at TechEx,
> >> I think this is a huge implementation for lots of institutions right
> >> now, and getting the identity bits right is critical.
> >>
> >> Nick
> >>
> >> From: 
> >> <
> >> <mailto:>>
> >>  on behalf of "Nathan A.
> Dors"
> >> <
> >>  
> >> <mailto:>>
> >> Reply-To: 
> >> "
> >>  
> >> <mailto:>"
> >> <
> >>  
> >> <mailto:>>
> >> Date: Wednesday, March 9, 2016 at 4:19 PM
> >> To: 
> >> "
> >>  
> >> <mailto:>"
> >> <
> >>  
> >> <mailto:>>
> >> Subject: [InC-Workday] workday panel at techex 2016; session proposal?
> >>
> >> Who's planning to attend the Internet2 Technology Exchange in Miami
> >> this September?
> >>
> >> Does anyone want to coordinate a session related to Workday projects?
> >>
> >> The planning committee for the Trust & Identity track believes
> >> Workday could be a useful topic for a CAMP session, maybe a panel,
> >> for an audience comprising current and future Workday customers, as
> >> well as others getting a handle on the kinds of IAM integrations
> >> involved in implementing enterprise-level cloud-based HR processes.
> >>
> >> The submission deadline has passed, but we can still get this in.
> >> Dean promised.
> >>
> >> Optionally, we could just BOF it.
> >>
> >> -Nathan
> >>
> >>
> >