Discussion of use cases and implementation experience integrating with Workday

[Nick Roy <>]

++

Nick



On 3/11/16, 8:46 AM, 
"
 on behalf of Paul Caskey" 
<
 on behalf of 
>
 wrote:

>+1 - InCommon is much more than metadata.   And there will be more stuff 
>coming soon for SPs like Workday.
>
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: 
>> 
>>  [
>> ]
>>  On Behalf Of Michael R Gettes
>> Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 9:21 AM
>> To: 
>> 
>> Subject: Re: [InC-Workday] workday panel at techex 2016; session proposal?
>> 
>> Well, to put a fine point on it, I think given where things land right 
>> now, our
>> ability to change things is approaching zero.  Had recent events not
>> happened, we could have convinced Workday of the “InCommon way”
>> which would also have been a positive impact on other Workday related
>> efforts.  I disagree with the “low value” assessment in that it was never 
>> just
>> about the metadata.
>> 
>> /mrg
>> 
>> > On Mar 11, 2016, at 10:14 AM, Steven Carmody
>> <>
>>  wrote:
>> >
>> > I don't want to be too much of a curmudgeon. But, given the required
>> effort and the very low value that campuses would get from having Workday
>> in the IC metadata (see the recent thread discussing this), why do we want
>> to invest much effort in strong-arming Workday ?
>> >
>> > On 3/9/16 6:42 PM, Nick Roy wrote:
>> >> Would this include figuring out how to strong-arm them into getting
>> >> religion on joining InCommon?  See: Michael Gettes' note about
>> >> Workday's decision to not join.  I guess that's a conversation that
>> >> I'd like to see happen sooner than TechEx, but it might be worth
>> discussing there, too.
>> >>
>> >> For what it's worth, I'd be happy to see a workday session at TechEx,
>> >> I think this is a huge implementation for lots of institutions right
>> >> now, and getting the identity bits right is critical.
>> >>
>> >> Nick
>> >>
>> >> From: 
>> >> <
>> >> <mailto:>>
>> >>  on behalf of "Nathan A.
>> Dors"
>> >> <
>> >>  
>> >> <mailto:>>
>> >> Reply-To: 
>> >> "
>> >>  
>> >> <mailto:>"
>> >> <
>> >>  
>> >> <mailto:>>
>> >> Date: Wednesday, March 9, 2016 at 4:19 PM
>> >> To: 
>> >> "
>> >>  
>> >> <mailto:>"
>> >> <
>> >>  
>> >> <mailto:>>
>> >> Subject: [InC-Workday] workday panel at techex 2016; session proposal?
>> >>
>> >> Who's planning to attend the Internet2 Technology Exchange in Miami
>> >> this September?
>> >>
>> >> Does anyone want to coordinate a session related to Workday projects?
>> >>
>> >> The planning committee for the Trust & Identity track believes
>> >> Workday could be a useful topic for a CAMP session, maybe a panel,
>> >> for an audience comprising current and future Workday customers, as
>> >> well as others getting a handle on the kinds of IAM integrations
>> >> involved in implementing enterprise-level cloud-based HR processes.
>> >>
>> >> The submission deadline has passed, but we can still get this in.
>> >> Dean promised.
>> >>
>> >> Optionally, we could just BOF it.
>> >>
>> >> -Nathan
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>