technical-discuss - Re: [InC-Technical] Re: Split InCommon into R&S and non-R&S federations?
Subject: InCommon Technical Discussions
List archive
- From: Nick Roy <>
- To: <>
- Subject: Re: [InC-Technical] Re: Split InCommon into R&S and non-R&S federations?
- Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 10:14:49 -0600
- Authentication-results: incommon.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;incommon.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=internet2.edu;
- Ironport-phdr: 9a23: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
- Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
- Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
David Kelsey from the FIM4R group is working on a proposal for a
research proxy trust mechanism called "Snctfi" that may provide value in
pursuit of this kind of proxy.
https://wiki.geant.org/display/AARC/Snctfi
Nick
Nick
On 3/30/17 7:18 AM, Scott Koranda wrote:
>> Perhaps this is better solved then by standing up a 2nd hub and spoke
>> style service? The VOs would use that one. The 100 or so who “get
>> it” would see no difference. The 300 ‘others’ would also be able to
>> interop just fine, but their users would be stopped at the federation
>> IdP to self-assert missing attributes?
>
> Perhaps.
>
> LIGO has resisted so far deploying an IdP/SP proxy and putting all of
> its SPs behind it to continue to try and advocate for better attribute
> release, both within InCommon and more generally throughout eduGAIN.
>
> But all the other research projects I work with are deploying proxies
> they operate individually as a project.
>
> I expect LIGO will move in that direction soon also.
>
> An InCommon proxy service for VOs would be interesting. It would need
> functionality that VOs require that is not always thought about for
> campus proxy solutions, but the VOs are well aware of those needs and
> can articulate them.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Scott K for LIGO
- [InC-Technical] Split InCommon into R&S and non-R&S federations?, Mark Scheible, 03/29/2017
- Re: [InC-Technical] Split InCommon into R&S and non-R&S federations?, Cantor, Scott, 03/29/2017
- [InC-Technical] Re: Split InCommon into R&S and non-R&S federations?, Scott Koranda, 03/30/2017
- Re: [InC-Technical] Re: Split InCommon into R&S and non-R&S federations?, David Langenberg, 03/30/2017
- Re: [InC-Technical] Re: Split InCommon into R&S and non-R&S federations?, Scott Koranda, 03/30/2017
- Re: [InC-Technical] Re: Split InCommon into R&S and non-R&S federations?, David Langenberg, 03/30/2017
- Re: [InC-Technical] Re: Split InCommon into R&S and non-R&S federations?, Tom Scavo, 03/30/2017
- Re: [InC-Technical] Re: Split InCommon into R&S and non-R&S federations?, Scott Koranda, 03/30/2017
- Re: [InC-Technical] Re: Split InCommon into R&S and non-R&S federations?, Nick Roy, 03/30/2017
- Re: [InC-Technical] Re: Split InCommon into R&S and non-R&S federations?, David Langenberg, 03/30/2017
- Re: [InC-Technical] Re: Split InCommon into R&S and non-R&S federations?, Scott Koranda, 03/30/2017
- Re: [InC-Technical] Re: Split InCommon into R&S and non-R&S federations?, Cantor, Scott, 03/30/2017
- Re: [InC-Technical] Re: Split InCommon into R&S and non-R&S federations?, Mark Scheible, 03/30/2017
- Re: [InC-Technical] Re: Split InCommon into R&S and non-R&S federations?, Janemarie Duh, 03/30/2017
- Re: [InC-Technical] Re: Split InCommon into R&S and non-R&S federations?, Steven Carmody, 03/30/2017
- Re: [InC-Technical] Re: Split InCommon into R&S and non-R&S federations?, Nick Roy, 03/30/2017
- Re: [InC-Technical] Re: Split InCommon into R&S and non-R&S federations?, Tom Scavo, 03/30/2017
- Re: [InC-Technical] Re: Split InCommon into R&S and non-R&S federations?, Wu, Albert, 03/30/2017
- Re: [InC-Technical] Re: Split InCommon into R&S and non-R&S federations?, Cantor, Scott, 03/30/2017
- Re: [InC-Technical] Re: Split InCommon into R&S and non-R&S federations?, David Langenberg, 03/30/2017
- Re: [InC-Technical] Split InCommon into R&S and non-R&S federations?, Nick Roy, 03/30/2017
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [InC-Technical] Split InCommon into R&S and non-R&S federations?, Mark Scheible, 03/30/2017
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.