Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

technical-discuss - Re: [InC-Technical] Re: Split InCommon into R&S and non-R&S federations?

Subject: InCommon Technical Discussions

List archive

Re: [InC-Technical] Re: Split InCommon into R&S and non-R&S federations?


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Wu, Albert" <>
  • To: "" <>
  • Subject: Re: [InC-Technical] Re: Split InCommon into R&S and non-R&S federations?
  • Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 16:55:28 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Authentication-results: incommon.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;incommon.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=ucla.edu;
  • Ironport-phdr: 9a23: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
  • Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
  • Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99

Gauging from this morning’s exchange, we seem to be close to coming up with a
set of actionable items. Would it be worthwhile to try to plan an impromptu
BoF/discussion at Global Summit?

albert

On 3/30/17, 9:40 AM,
"
on behalf of Tom Scavo"
<
on behalf of
>
wrote:

On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 9:40 AM, Cantor, Scott
<>
wrote:
> On 3/30/17, 7:06 AM,
"
on behalf of Scott Koranda"
<
on behalf of
>
wrote:
>
>> Yet a lot of energy and resources are spent attempting to motivate
those
>> 300 to operate like the 100, even though those 300 fundamentally do not
>> have the drivers that might push them to operate at the higher level.
>>
>> So my proposal is to stop trying.
>
> Independent of any technical direction, +1 to that assessment of where
our energy should be focused.

I agree with that assessment but it begs the (more positive) question:
how do we invest what limited resources we have? One approach is to
abruptly turn the problem on its head and focus on the R&S SP (which
is essentially what David suggested). Set a concrete goal to double
the number of R&S SPs in the next 12 months. In doing so, we will make
R&S indispensable and irresistible to IdPs.

Tom





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page