per-entity - Re: [Per-Entity] remaining BIG questions
Subject: Per-Entity Metadata Working Group
List archive
- From: "Cantor, Scott" <>
- To: Nick Roy <>, "" <>
- Subject: Re: [Per-Entity] remaining BIG questions
- Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 20:40:15 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
- Authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 164.107.81.220) smtp.mailfrom=osu.edu; incommon.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;incommon.org; dmarc=bestguesspass action=none header.from=osu.edu;
- Ironport-phdr: 9a23:5QiwHxCgzk6OH6zeEZ3hUyQJP3N1i/DPJgcQr6AfoPdwSP7/osbcNUDSrc9gkEXOFd2Crakb26yL6Ou5BCQp2tWojjMrSNR0TRgLiMEbzUQLIfWuLgnFFsPsdDEwB89YVVVorDmROElRH9viNRWJ+iXhpRZbIBj0NBJ0K+LpAcaSyp3vj6Hhs6HUNiNJjzn1W7RjZEGwtwLAnsgQnYZ4LKstkF3ErmYeP6wc3W5yYF+Vgxfg9++x+pVk9iFXvbQm7cEKGfHicr59QLpEDSg3G2Ez78rusB7FCwyV6S1PfH8Rl08CKAHD8BbgGt/KuSzmqqA1jCKTO9HxV/ZucTO58uFmRAK+23RPDCIw7GyC0p84t6lcuh/04kUnm4M=
- Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
- Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
On 9/14/16, 4:35 PM, "Nick Roy"
<>
wrote:
> I thought I remembered you saying that you were going to have to make
> changes to Shibboleth client software to achieve the kinds of uptime
> goals you were hoping for when we started researching CDN
> characteristics. What happened to that line of thinking?
That line of thinking was really foremost about caching across restarts, and
yes, we will (Brent just sent his IdP proposal to our list).
But I don't really see us implementing the levels of sophistication in the
HTTP client code we'd be talking about here.
Failover is "free" as long as you can live with timeouts, but I think that's
somewhat unreliable in practice (timeouts in networking code are very hard to
trust, at least in my experience).
But I don't know that we'll be implementing redundant URLs inside a single
resolver, and I definitely don't see us implementing multiple A record
support on a single hostname unless libcurl and/or the Apache Commons
HttpClient already do it for us (they might, I haven't looked).
-- Scott
- Re: [Per-Entity] remaining BIG questions, (continued)
- Re: [Per-Entity] remaining BIG questions, Cantor, Scott, 09/14/2016
- Re: [Per-Entity] remaining BIG questions, Tom Scavo, 09/14/2016
- Re: [Per-Entity] remaining BIG questions, Cantor, Scott, 09/14/2016
- Re: [Per-Entity] remaining BIG questions, Nick Roy, 09/14/2016
- Re: [Per-Entity] remaining BIG questions, Nick Roy, 09/14/2016
- Re: [Per-Entity] remaining BIG questions, Cantor, Scott, 09/14/2016
- Re: [Per-Entity] remaining BIG questions, Nick Roy, 09/14/2016
- Re: [Per-Entity] remaining BIG questions, Nick Roy, 09/14/2016
- Re: [Per-Entity] remaining BIG questions, Cantor, Scott, 09/14/2016
- Re: [Per-Entity] remaining BIG questions, Nick Roy, 09/14/2016
- Re: [Per-Entity] remaining BIG questions, Cantor, Scott, 09/14/2016
- Re: [Per-Entity] remaining BIG questions, Nick Roy, 09/14/2016
- Re: [Per-Entity] remaining BIG questions, Nick Roy, 09/14/2016
- Re: [Per-Entity] remaining BIG questions, Cantor, Scott, 09/14/2016
- Re: [Per-Entity] remaining BIG questions, Nick Roy, 09/14/2016
- Re: [Per-Entity] remaining BIG questions, Cantor, Scott, 09/14/2016
- Re: [Per-Entity] remaining BIG questions, Cantor, Scott, 09/14/2016
- Re: [Per-Entity] remaining BIG questions, Patrick Radtke, 09/14/2016
- Re: [Per-Entity] remaining BIG questions, Nick Roy, 09/14/2016
- Re: [Per-Entity] remaining BIG questions, Tom Scavo, 09/14/2016
- Re: [Per-Entity] remaining BIG questions, Cantor, Scott, 09/14/2016
- Re: [Per-Entity] remaining BIG questions, David Walker, 09/14/2016
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.