per-entity - Re: [Per-Entity] remaining BIG questions
Subject: Per-Entity Metadata Working Group
List archive
- From: "Cantor, Scott" <>
- To: Tom Scavo <>
- Cc: Per-Entity Metadata Working Group <>
- Subject: Re: [Per-Entity] remaining BIG questions
- Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 18:42:59 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
- Authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 164.107.81.208) smtp.mailfrom=osu.edu; incommon.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;incommon.org; dmarc=bestguesspass action=none header.from=osu.edu;
- Ironport-phdr: 9a23:D8ySPBDc01MafbKhzcbQUyQJP3N1i/DPJgcQr6AfoPdwSP3yocbcNUDSrc9gkEXOFd2Crakb26yL6Ou5BCQp2tWojjMrSNR0TRgLiMEbzUQLIfWuLgnFFsPsdDEwB89YVVVorDmROElRH9viNRWJ+iXhpRZbIBj0NBJ0K+LpAcaSyp3vj6Hhs6HUNjlPgXKGarpsK13isR/KvcAIhqNjLLo80B3EviEOduhLkzBGP1WWylzX78Gs+4Qnux9bvO49vYYUWqz8Y6MiC+ZwCy87dW05+Zu45lH4UQKT6y5EAS0tmR1SDl2AtUmiUw==
- Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
- Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
On 9/14/16, 2:27 PM,
"
on behalf of Tom Scavo"
<
on behalf of
>
wrote:
> For per-entity metadata, it's a totally different story. Fail over
> needs to be automatic, and the various servers need to be
> strategically located in geographic regions such that latency is
> minimized (or at least acceptable).
>
> Does that help?
It does, but I had the impression CDNs were part of the failover story here,
that IC would probably operate the "backbone" and perhaps a redundant site
that might be manual or automatic (preferably the latter of course) but that
some kind of CDN strategy would be the core of the model.
I really thought the whole idea with CDNs was that the client doesn't need to
know. I fetch from mdq.incommon.org and the Internet's magical wonderfulness
routes me to the best option and constantly monitors for options being down
without me having to care.
I'm starting to come to grips with GSLB here in a campus context, and that's
what they (will) do for us. Mercifully, this is a stateless service unlike an
IdP, so the issues are much simpler.
-- Scott
- [Per-Entity] remaining BIG questions, Tom Scavo, 09/14/2016
- Re: [Per-Entity] remaining BIG questions, Steve Thorpe, 09/14/2016
- Re: [Per-Entity] remaining BIG questions, Nick Roy, 09/14/2016
- Re: [Per-Entity] remaining BIG questions, Tom Scavo, 09/14/2016
- Re: [Per-Entity] remaining BIG questions, Cantor, Scott, 09/14/2016
- Re: [Per-Entity] remaining BIG questions, Tom Scavo, 09/14/2016
- Re: [Per-Entity] remaining BIG questions, Cantor, Scott, 09/14/2016
- Re: [Per-Entity] remaining BIG questions, Tom Scavo, 09/14/2016
- Re: [Per-Entity] remaining BIG questions, Cantor, Scott, 09/14/2016
- Re: [Per-Entity] remaining BIG questions, Tom Scavo, 09/14/2016
- Re: [Per-Entity] remaining BIG questions, Cantor, Scott, 09/14/2016
- Re: [Per-Entity] remaining BIG questions, Tom Scavo, 09/14/2016
- Re: [Per-Entity] remaining BIG questions, Cantor, Scott, 09/14/2016
- Re: [Per-Entity] remaining BIG questions, Tom Scavo, 09/14/2016
- Re: [Per-Entity] remaining BIG questions, Cantor, Scott, 09/14/2016
- Re: [Per-Entity] remaining BIG questions, Nick Roy, 09/14/2016
- Re: [Per-Entity] remaining BIG questions, Nick Roy, 09/14/2016
- Re: [Per-Entity] remaining BIG questions, Cantor, Scott, 09/14/2016
- Re: [Per-Entity] remaining BIG questions, Nick Roy, 09/14/2016
- Re: [Per-Entity] remaining BIG questions, Nick Roy, 09/14/2016
- Re: [Per-Entity] remaining BIG questions, Cantor, Scott, 09/14/2016
- Re: [Per-Entity] remaining BIG questions, Nick Roy, 09/14/2016
- Re: [Per-Entity] remaining BIG questions, Cantor, Scott, 09/14/2016
- Re: [Per-Entity] remaining BIG questions, Nick Roy, 09/14/2016
- Re: [Per-Entity] remaining BIG questions, Nick Roy, 09/14/2016
- Re: [Per-Entity] remaining BIG questions, Cantor, Scott, 09/14/2016
- Re: [Per-Entity] remaining BIG questions, Nick Roy, 09/14/2016
- Re: [Per-Entity] remaining BIG questions, Cantor, Scott, 09/14/2016
- Re: [Per-Entity] remaining BIG questions, Cantor, Scott, 09/14/2016
- Re: [Per-Entity] remaining BIG questions, Tom Scavo, 09/14/2016
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.