Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

per-entity - Re: [Per-Entity] draft slides on WG for TAC webinar

Subject: Per-Entity Metadata Working Group

List archive

Re: [Per-Entity] draft slides on WG for TAC webinar


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Steven Carmody <>
  • To: Tom Scavo <>
  • Cc: Per-Entity Metadata Working Group <>
  • Subject: Re: [Per-Entity] draft slides on WG for TAC webinar
  • Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 09:13:50 -0400
  • Ironport-phdr: 9a23:OjOOyhTHokjeO4u+kYaNp/nP89psv+yvbD5Q0YIujvd0So/mwa64ZBeN2/xhgRfzUJnB7Loc0qyN7PCmBDdLuMvJmUtBWaIPfidNsd8RkQ0kDZzNImzAB9muURYHGt9fXkRu5XCxPBsdMs//Y1rPvi/6tmZKSV3XfDB4LeXtG4PUk9//l6Xro8WSME10g2+BZrY6Fx6/swKZ4tUMmoBrNKEZyx3Vr2FOdvgMg25kOATAsQz745KL4JN9/iIYkPs78slMQO2uZLg1U7FeOz8vKWUy6NzDvwPEUg3J63cBBDZF2iFUChTIuUmpFqz6tTH3468kgHGX

On 8/17/16 3:29 PM, Tom Scavo wrote:

Will they have to do something ?

Almost certainly but it's too early to say.

I'm thinking it would be helpful to give the audience a heads up that this change will be coming -- as you say, we don't yet have the details. But, I think we can describe the big picture.


And in the meantime how would they
know if they're already having problems ?

If their deployment is having problems, they would certainly know
that. As suggested on the TAC mailing list, a couple of well-designed
poll questions would help us understand the scope of the problem.

Steven, how much webinar time does the WG have? 10 minutes? That
doesn't give us much time to do a deep dive.


I think a deep dive would be a very bad fit with this audience. Just my opinion.




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page