Per-Entity Metadata Working Group

[Nicholas Roy <>]

On 8/17/16 3:36 AM, Scott Koranda wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> John Bradley says that Ping support for MDQ is not production-ready, and
>> looped me in with David Chase to elaborate.  I have not heard back from
>> David.  I also have not heard anything further from Zion Brewer, beyond
>> that he was seeking out input from some engineering teams and hadn't
>> heard back from them.  Maybe we should just annotate the information we
>> have about non-Shibboleth/SSP implementations as guesswork, or delete
>> those rows from our analysis entirely?
> I would like to keep the rows and add whatever information we
> do have, including this information. Yes, we should try to
> indicate the level of certainty around the information for the
> non-Shib/SSP implementation but I am not too concerned--I
> don't think we intend the table to serve as a de facto
> reference nor will anyone try to use it that way.

Thanks Scott, I've added an asterisk to the implementations we don't
have solid information for, and noted that at the bottom of the table.

Nick

>
> We all know how this is going to go--Shibboleth and
> SimpleSAMLphp will lead on MDQ and be many years ahead of any
> other products being used at scale by Federation participants.
>
> We have stipulated that aggregates are not going away any time
> soon and some accomodations will need to be made for the other
> deployers, but we should not let that distract us from
> crafting a roadmap addressing what can be accomplished for the
> large majority of the community that runs Shibboleth/SSP.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Scott K

-- 
Nick

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature