Per-Entity Metadata Working Group

[David Walker <>]

I'm fine with removing this from the slides if it may cause some grief.  For ourselves, though, here's item #2 from our charter (emphasis mine):

Develop a roadmap for addressing the immediate needs for reduced aggregate size, as well as intermediate milestones along a trajectory to a sustainable future state, to be determined.  The first items on this roadmap should include building a production service which allows production SAML deployments to exercise their per-entity metadata capabilities, and include checkpoints to improve the service and software when issues are encountered.  If short-term steps such as InCommon producing separate IdP and SP feeds are deemed necessary, these items should be included in this roadmap.  This roadmap should also address the issue of continued creation (or eventual decommissioning) of multi-entity aggregates.

David

On 08/17/2016 10:01 AM, Scott Koranda wrote:

On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 11:58 AM, Scott Koranda  wrote:

I would remove this sentence from slide #2:

"Production of separate IdP and SP aggregate feeds?"

Why?

Because it leads to a rathole of questions that have nothing to do
with per-entity metadata.

It's like attribute release. Privacy is certainly an issue but if
that's all we talk about, we won't get anywhere.

I don't entirely agree, and I think more information for
InCommon Participants is better than less, but I am happy to
defer to you since you and Ops have not had the opportunity to
really weigh in yet on splitting the aggregates.

I have removed that line.

Thanks much for the feedback,

Scott K

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature