assurance - Re: [Assurance] comments on draft MFA Interop WG documents
Subject: Assurance
List archive
- From: "Basney, Jim" <>
- To: InCommon Assurance <>
- Subject: Re: [Assurance] comments on draft MFA Interop WG documents
- Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 16:12:28 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
>>>Would a formal institutional declaration of compliance with the MFA
>>>profile cause you to trust its MFA assertions more?
>>
>> Yes.
>
>Can I ask why? What's the difference between self-asserting a category
>and self-asserting the same data in an assertion?
I think my answer is the same for Base Level, MFA, Silver, or Bronze. Our
trust fabric is based on contractual agreements between InCommon LLC and
its participants, and that trust is operationalized via the federation
metadata. Knowing that an institutional representative made a declaration
to InCommon (either via an Assurance Addendum or via a checkbox on the
Federation Manager), subject to the Participation Agreement, gives me
greater trust in the organization's compliance with an InCommon standard
than I get from IdP-SP bidirectional communication alone.
-Jim
- Re: [Assurance] comments on draft MFA Interop WG documents, Basney, Jim, 05/04/2016
- RE: [Assurance] comments on draft MFA Interop WG documents, Paul Caskey, 05/04/2016
- RE: [Assurance] comments on draft MFA Interop WG documents, Cantor, Scott, 05/04/2016
- RE: [Assurance] comments on draft MFA Interop WG documents, Jokl, James A. (Jim) (jaj), 05/04/2016
- RE: [Assurance] comments on draft MFA Interop WG documents, Paul Caskey, 05/04/2016
- Re: [Assurance] comments on draft MFA Interop WG documents, David Walker, 05/04/2016
- RE: [Assurance] comments on draft MFA Interop WG documents, Paul Caskey, 05/04/2016
- Re: [Assurance] comments on draft MFA Interop WG documents, David Walker, 05/04/2016
- RE: [Assurance] comments on draft MFA Interop WG documents, Cantor, Scott, 05/04/2016
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [Assurance] comments on draft MFA Interop WG documents, Herrington, Karen, 05/10/2016
- Re: [Assurance] comments on draft MFA Interop WG documents, Basney, Jim, 05/10/2016
- RE: [Assurance] comments on draft MFA Interop WG documents, Cantor, Scott, 05/10/2016
- Re: [Assurance] comments on draft MFA Interop WG documents, Basney, Jim, 05/10/2016
- RE: [Assurance] comments on draft MFA Interop WG documents, Cantor, Scott, 05/10/2016
- Re: [Assurance] comments on draft MFA Interop WG documents, Basney, Jim, 05/10/2016
- Re: [Assurance] comments on draft MFA Interop WG documents, Tom Barton, 05/10/2016
- Re: [Assurance] comments on draft MFA Interop WG documents, Scott Koranda, 05/10/2016
- Re: [Assurance] comments on draft MFA Interop WG documents, Ann West, 05/10/2016
- Re: [Assurance] comments on draft MFA Interop WG documents, Scott Koranda, 05/10/2016
- Re: [Assurance] comments on draft MFA Interop WG documents, Tom Barton, 05/10/2016
- Re: [Assurance] comments on draft MFA Interop WG documents, Ann West, 05/10/2016
- Re: [Assurance] comments on draft MFA Interop WG documents, Scott Koranda, 05/10/2016
- RE: [Assurance] comments on draft MFA Interop WG documents, Cantor, Scott, 05/10/2016
- RE: [Assurance] comments on draft MFA Interop WG documents, Paul Caskey, 05/10/2016
- Re: [Assurance] comments on draft MFA Interop WG documents, Ann West, 05/10/2016
- Re: [Assurance] comments on draft MFA Interop WG documents, Ann West, 05/10/2016
- Re: [Assurance] comments on draft MFA Interop WG documents, Scott Koranda, 05/10/2016
- RE: [Assurance] comments on draft MFA Interop WG documents, Cantor, Scott, 05/10/2016
- RE: [Assurance] comments on draft MFA Interop WG documents, Paul Caskey, 05/04/2016
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.