Assurance

[Ann West <>]

Scott,

I think I share that loads of buy-in thing with Tom.

Several questions come to my mind:
- Is this a good-enough starting point?
- Is it supportable by most organizations?
- If yes to both, then:
        - What should be the timeframe for participation adoption?
        - What are the carrots/sticks for post adherence deadline?
        - What is the community willing to do to help encourage/enforce 
adoption
by your peers/partners?

Ann
 

On 5/10/16, 9:36 AM, 
"
 on behalf of Tom
Barton" 
<
 on behalf of 
>
wrote:

>Scott,
>
>Yes, they proposed practices have changed substantially in response to
>feedback already received. Re timelines, everyone wants this to happen.
>At this point I'm probably the biggest hold up by insisting that we get
>loads of feedback and buy in.
>
>Tom
>
>On 5/10/2016 10:06 AM, Scott Koranda wrote:
>> Hi Tom,
>>
>>> Beyond agreeing with Jim and appreciating his conciseness(!), I
>>>address his
>>> question by noting that the InCommon Assurance Advisory Committee will
>>>hold
>>> a BoF at 7:30am next Wednesday morning at the Global Summit on Baseline
>>> Practices. Purpose is to get feedback on elements proposed to be
>>> incorporated into something that would effectively replace the
>>>Participant
>>> Operating Practices doc.
>>>
>>> There will be more opportunities to give feedback! This is just the
>>>next
>>> one, for those who may be available to participate.
>> Thanks for the update.
>>
>> There was also opportunity for feedback at the last TechX in
>> Cleveland.
>>
>> Is there any change to the proposed baseline practices from
>> what was presented in Cleveland?
>>
>> Is there still any possibility that in 2016 InCommmon will
>> have a POP replacement?
>>
>> I plan to be at the BOF and would like to hear about
>> timelines, but any information you can provide to the list
>> would also be helpful.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Scott K for LIGO
>