Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

assurance - Re: [Assurance] comments on draft MFA Interop WG documents

Subject: Assurance

List archive

Re: [Assurance] comments on draft MFA Interop WG documents


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Ann West <>
  • To: "" <>
  • Subject: Re: [Assurance] comments on draft MFA Interop WG documents
  • Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 15:31:51 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Authentication-results: incommon.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;incommon.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=internet2.edu;
  • Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
  • Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
Hi Scott,

Can you provide a bit more detail on what ³have a POP replacement² means
for you?

Thanks,
Ann

On 5/10/16, 9:06 AM,
"
on behalf of Scott
Koranda"
<
on behalf of
>
wrote:

>Thanks for the update.
>
>There was also opportunity for feedback at the last TechX in
>Cleveland.
>
>Is there any change to the proposed baseline practices from
>what was presented in Cleveland?
>
>Is there still any possibility that in 2016 InCommmon will
>have a POP replacement?
>
>I plan to be at the BOF and would like to hear about
>timelines, but any information you can provide to the list
>would also be helpful.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Scott K for LIGO


Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page