Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

assurance - RE: [Assurance] comments on draft MFA Interop WG documents

Subject: Assurance

List archive

RE: [Assurance] comments on draft MFA Interop WG documents


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Cantor, Scott" <>
  • To: "" <>
  • Subject: RE: [Assurance] comments on draft MFA Interop WG documents
  • Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 15:40:10 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 164.107.81.210) smtp.mailfrom=osu.edu; incommon.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;incommon.org; dmarc=bestguesspass action=none header.from=osu.edu;
  • Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
  • Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23

> Yes, they proposed practices have changed substantially in response to
> feedback already received. Re timelines, everyone wants this to happen.
> At this point I'm probably the biggest hold up by insisting that we get
> loads of feedback and buy in.

I felt as though the most significant hold up was in regard to compliance and
the consequences for non-compliance. I didn't sense much consensus last year
on that issue.

-- ScottC




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page