Assurance

[Scott Koranda <>]

Hi,

> Can you provide a bit more detail on what ³have a POP replacement² means
> for you?

Any assurance other than institutional reputation and a signed
participant agreement.

I think the baseline practices presented in Cleveland would be
a great next step. Can they be adopted by the end of 2016?

Thanks,

Scott K for LIGO

> 
> Thanks,
> Ann
> 
> On 5/10/16, 9:06 AM, 
> "
>  on behalf of Scott
> Koranda" 
> <
>  on behalf of 
> >
> wrote:
> 
> >Thanks for the update.
> >
> >There was also opportunity for feedback at the last TechX in
> >Cleveland.
> >
> >Is there any change to the proposed baseline practices from
> >what was presented in Cleveland?
> >
> >Is there still any possibility that in 2016 InCommmon will
> >have a POP replacement?
> >
> >I plan to be at the BOF and would like to hear about
> >timelines, but any information you can provide to the list
> >would also be helpful.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >
> >Scott K for LIGO
>