Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

assurance - Re: [Assurance] RE: [confluence] InC-Assurance > Remote-Proofing Approaches

Subject: Assurance

List archive

Re: [Assurance] RE: [confluence] InC-Assurance > Remote-Proofing Approaches


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Cantor, Scott" <>
  • To: "" <>
  • Subject: Re: [Assurance] RE: [confluence] InC-Assurance > Remote-Proofing Approaches
  • Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:35:23 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US

On 8/10/12 11:16 AM, "William G. Thompson, Jr."
<>
wrote:
>
>I do appreciate your perspective, and I realize this expanded vision of
>commercial partner participation is only somewhat related to some SP
>accepting Unicon's IdP assertions.

I was just trying to note that it's 100% unrelated at the moment.

>I guess what I was trying to hint at is that accepting commercial
>partners in the IAP would signal a more equal footing in the federation
>and perhaps pave the way for more streamlined access.

I don't think it will, but I donĀ¹t disagree at all with your point.

>We mostly get access to campus VPNs, Window/Linux Hosts, and
> internal wikis. If at some point in the future these systems require
>bronze/silver/etc we'd be left out in the cold so to speak. (perhaps
>rightly so :)

I'll refrain from comment other than to say "I don't think it will".

-- Scott




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page