md-distro - Re: [md-distro] use of the preview aggregate
Subject: Metadata Distribution Subcommittee of TAC
List archive
- From: "Cantor, Scott" <>
- To: "" <>
- Subject: Re: [md-distro] use of the preview aggregate
- Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 01:31:48 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
- Authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 164.107.81.222) ;
On 12/16/14, 12:59 AM, "Tom Scavo"
<>
wrote:
>
>Let me put a stake in the ground: What if we left the eduGAIN entity
>descriptors in the preview aggregate for, say, 30 days?
I sort of misunderstood, I didn't realize the idea was to use it as a
testing mechanism for the federation itself, vs. the participants. I guess
that's ok, though it's a little off putting to have the data show up and
then disappear.
Maybe we need a "beta" aggregate that's explicitly not expected to be
stable in the sense that things could be added and then removed.
>One requirement that I've heard is that we should put an XML comment
>in the preview aggregate that says something about the intended use of
>the aggregate. How do folks feel about that?
Doesn't hurt.
-- Scott
- [md-distro] use of the preview aggregate, Tom Scavo, 12/15/2014
- Re: [md-distro] use of the preview aggregate, Cantor, Scott, 12/15/2014
- Re: [md-distro] use of the preview aggregate, Ian Young, 12/15/2014
- Re: [md-distro] use of the preview aggregate, Tom Scavo, 12/15/2014
- Re: [md-distro] use of the preview aggregate, Cantor, Scott, 12/16/2014
- Re: [md-distro] use of the preview aggregate, Tom Scavo, 12/16/2014
- Re: [md-distro] use of the preview aggregate, Cantor, Scott, 12/16/2014
- Re: [md-distro] use of the preview aggregate, Tom Scavo, 12/16/2014
- Re: [md-distro] use of the preview aggregate, Cantor, Scott, 12/16/2014
- Re: [md-distro] use of the preview aggregate, Tom Scavo, 12/16/2014
- Re: [md-distro] use of the preview aggregate, Cantor, Scott, 12/16/2014
- Re: [md-distro] use of the preview aggregate, Cantor, Scott, 12/15/2014
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.