Interfederation

[Ann West <>]

Warren,

My main point here is to include a reference to the regional R&E network
provider work in the Charter to make it explicit that their use cases will
be considered by the group. Given most are not used to working in the
InC/MW space, making sure we mention them will help encourage their
participation, an important thing if they will be providing a substantial
number of our domestic use cases. These folks vary widely in their
identity expertise and knowledge, so a subcommittee sounds like a good
approach here. 

Here's a suggested tweak:

e. Establish practices and policies for domestic interfederation.
Subcommittee: Identify use cases, such as those from the regional R&E
network providers. Pilot projects.

Mark S or Paul, anything to add?


Thanks,
Ann




On 9/24/13 10:47 AM, "Warren Anderson" 
<>
 wrote:

>Hi Ann,
>
>Sorry if I'm being naive - I'm new to the group. I would have thought
>that regional federations were use cases for proposed charter item 1.e:
>
>e. Establish practices and policies for domestic interfederation.
>Subcommittee: Identify use cases. Pilot projects.
>
>It seems to me that regional federations are great use cases for domestic
>federation, and that it would be great if someone wanted to initiate a
>pilot project for one (or more) of them.
>
>Again, sorry if I'm missing the point - just trying to get up to speed.
>
>Cheers,
>Warren
>
>On Sep 24, 2013, at 16:26 , Ann West 
><>
> wrote:
>
>> At one point, we had a reference to the Regionals providing one or more
>> use cases for interfed. It seems that this has dropped out with the text
>> now written to favor international use cases.
>> 
>> I would advocate that we do include domestic examples, if only to ensure
>> what we're doing with our international colleagues still maps well
>> nationally.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 9/23/13 11:41 AM, "Steven Carmody" 
>> <>
>>  wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> Last week Jim Basney, Warren Anderson (LIGO, Leader of the next phase),
>>> and I had a conference call (Paul Caskey was unavailable due to travel;
>>> Paul has agreed to serve as the TAC Liaison for Phase Two). We provided
>>> some background and context for Warren, we reviewed the deliverables
>>> from Phase One (led by Jim), and we reviewed the DRAFT Charter for
>>>Phase
>>> Two. We're now poised to startup Phase Two.
>>> 
>>> The first step is to ensure that we're comfortable with the DRAFT
>>> Charter, available here:
>>> 
>>> https://spaces.internet2.edu/display/inctac/Interfed+Subcommittee
>>> 
>>> The deliverables from Phase One can be reviewed here:
>>> 
>>> https://spaces.internet2.edu/x/DAMlAg
>>> 
>>> Please use email to suggest changes (additions and deletions) tot he
>>> DRAFT. I'd like to close this discussion by next monday, and then move
>>> the new Charter forward.
>>> 
>>> Thanks!
>>> 
>> 
>
>+================[ WARREN G. ANDERSON ]====================+
>| PO Box 413, Dept. of Physics, Milwaukee, WI 53201, USA   |
>|   CANADA: (403) 617 6720          USA: (414) 212 5446    |
>+==========================================================+
>
>