InCommon Technical Discussions

[Nick Roy <>]

I believe all the comments on this thread except for the one about
errorURL amount to low-level details about things that are already
accounted for in the AAC's definition of baseline.  errorURL is the only
one that would require us to go back to the AAC.  Pinging Tom B and
Brett on this for their take on that.

Nick

On 11/10/17 12:12 PM, Steven Carmody wrote:
> On 11/8/17 3:58 PM, Cantor, Scott wrote:
>>
>> I'd like to see errorURL be required with guidance around what should
>> be behind it.
>>
>
> +1
>
> We all know how many years it will take to develop consensus on
> version 2, get it approved, get it accepted, and get it widely
> implemented. Not to mention the versioning problems.
>
> If we send this back to the AAC right now, it will add an extra 2-3 on
> this to the process for this version. That's trivial, compared to how
> long it will take to promulgate V2.
>
> In addition, given all the comments int his thread, we're probably
> sending it back to the AAC anyway.
>
> So, I'd vote strongly for making errorURL a MUST, along with guidance.
>
>
>
>