InCommon Technical Discussions

["Farmer, Jacob" <>]

+1

 

Makes sense to me.

 

Jacob

 

From: Scott Koranda [mailto:]
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2017 1:54 PM
To: Farmer, Jacob <>
Cc: Nick Roy <>;
Subject: Re: [InC-Technical] InCommon Baseline Expectations Metadata Requirements

 

Also, I completely agree with having a standardized dimension, but I am not sure where this exact dimension came from. Has there been a survey done of widely-used identity selectors to make sure that resolution is commonly used? (and it's entirely possible this was done and I just missed that part of the thread)

 

 There is no standard.

 

The closest thing to a standard is this well stated recommendation from the Shibboleth Project for the Shibboleth Embedded Discovery Service (EDS):

 

https://wiki.shibboleth.net/confluence/display/EDS10/4.+Metadata+Considerations

 

I am asking that InCommon "put a stake in the ground" and settle on 80w x 60h as a de facto standard. 

 

Thanks,

 

Scott K for LIGO

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature