InCommon Technical Discussions

["Farmer, Jacob" <>]

Yeah, that presentation is very sub-optimal. 

On a personal note, I had no idea what our image in MDUI was until this
thread started. As far as I can tell, it is probably 5+ years old and I have
no idea who chose it. It was clearly treated as an afterthought and that's
not the way it should be. (A new version is on its way) 

Something else I've learned: I had no idea that any SPs were reworking those
images by hand. I've tried to visit all of the federated sites I use on a
regular basis and have not been able to find our image "in the wild." I
think that is a sign that this kind of by-hand rework is common. Clearly,
this does not scale, and is not a reasonable thing to expect SPs to do.

Jacob

-----Original Message-----
From: 

[mailto:]
 On Behalf Of Scott Koranda
Sent: Monday, November 13, 2017 4:10 PM
To: David Shafer 
<>
Cc: 

Subject: Re: [InC-Technical] InCommon Baseline Expectations Metadata
Requirements

> And a couple examples of the logos in action on those sites (picking on IU
again):
> 
> https://twitter.com/IndianaUniv
> https://www.facebook.com/IndianaUniversity/
> 

Here is an exercise that is perhaps more realistic of how the logos will be
used by R&S service providers:

Use a private browsing window and browse to

https://www.scienceforum.sc

Click "Sign In" in the upper right.

You will be redirected to an IdP discovery service.

Click "Find my login server". Type "Indiana University"
into the box. Then click "Continue".

Get to the IU IdP. Click your browser back button to go back to the
discovery page.

You will see an interesting rendering of the IU logo that is currently in
metadata.

If there was a de facto InCommon standard on size we could do better...

Thanks,

Scott K

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature