mfa-interop - Re: [MFA-Interop] Is the InCommon MFA Profile ready to use?
Subject: MFA Interop Working Group
List archive
- From: David Walker <>
- To: <>
- Subject: Re: [MFA-Interop] Is the InCommon MFA Profile ready to use?
- Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 09:54:03 -0700
- Authentication-results: incommon.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;incommon.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=internet2.edu;
- Ironport-phdr: 9a23:o/VMCBMYlskbxUc1+PQl6mtUPXoX/o7sNwtQ0KIMzox0K/X6rarrMEGX3/hxlliBBdydsK0UzbeN+Pm9EUU7or+/81k6OKRWUBEEjchE1ycBO+WiTXPBEfjxciYhF95DXlI2t1uyMExSBdqsLwaK+i76wCAfACr/NBZ4Y6HcUs6X1pzvlrP6x5qGNwBGjX+8Z69/NhKuhQTXvc4ThIxkbKErxU2ajGFPfrF6zH1pKRqslhL/6934qJJ8+iBTtugJ9shcXL/8crhiC7FUEWJ1YCgO+MT3uEybHkO07XwGXzBTy0IQDg==
- Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
- Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
Mark, The one pending change will be to replace the URIs we used to identify the profiles with URIs that have been assigned by REFEDS, the international body of national federations like Incommon, so that the profile can be used internationally. Right now, we're expecting to know those next month, so waiting is probably your best bet for putting the existing URIs into production, but starting some testing certainly sounds like a good idea. Just make sure you're prepared to switch to the REFEDS-assigned URIs before going into production. David On 09/12/2016 09:35 AM, Mark Montague
wrote:
Hi, |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- [MFA-Interop] Is the InCommon MFA Profile ready to use?, Mark Montague, 09/12/2016
- RE: [MFA-Interop] Is the InCommon MFA Profile ready to use?, Paul Caskey, 09/12/2016
- RE: [MFA-Interop] Is the InCommon MFA Profile ready to use?, Cantor, Scott, 09/12/2016
- Re: [MFA-Interop] Is the InCommon MFA Profile ready to use?, David Walker, 09/12/2016
- Re: [MFA-Interop] Is the InCommon MFA Profile ready to use?, Mark Montague, 09/12/2016
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.