interfed - Re: [inc-interfed] Apr 2 notes / Apr 9 agenda

Subject: Interfederation

List archive

Re: [inc-interfed] Apr 2 notes / Apr 9 agenda

From: "Cantor, Scott" <>
To: "" <>
Subject: Re: [inc-interfed] Apr 2 notes / Apr 9 agenda
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2013 01:18:47 +0000
Accept-language: en-US
Authentication-results: sfpop-ironport07.merit.edu; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none

On 4/3/13 9:07 PM, "Tom Scavo"
<>
wrote:

>On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 6:08 PM, Cantor, Scott
><>
> wrote:
>>
>> I would be very disappointed with an outcome of "role
>> only" since that is not the definition of the element today.
>
>I haven't heard anyone say that.

Ok. I apparently misread something.

>Yes, but your spec is silent about these details. I'm just trying to
>clarify some points so consumers (like myself) know what to expect.

I wouldn't even call it a spec, at this stage. I never turned it into one,
which is why it never showed up in a document anywhere. I'm fine with Ian
turning it into one and I agree that this should be specified.

-- Scott

[inc-interfed] Apr 2 notes / Apr 9 agenda, Jim Basney, 04/02/2013
- Re: [inc-interfed] Apr 2 notes / Apr 9 agenda, Ian Young, 04/02/2013
- Re: [inc-interfed] Apr 2 notes / Apr 9 agenda, Tom Scavo, 04/02/2013
  - Re: [inc-interfed] Apr 2 notes / Apr 9 agenda, Ian Young, 04/03/2013
    - Re: [inc-interfed] Apr 2 notes / Apr 9 agenda, Tom Scavo, 04/03/2013
      - Re: [inc-interfed] Apr 2 notes / Apr 9 agenda, Cantor, Scott, 04/03/2013
        
        Re: [inc-interfed] Apr 2 notes / Apr 9 agenda, Tom Scavo, 04/03/2013
        
        Re: [inc-interfed] Apr 2 notes / Apr 9 agenda, Cantor, Scott, 04/03/2013
  - Re: [inc-interfed] Apr 2 notes / Apr 9 agenda, John Krienke, 04/09/2013
    - Re: [inc-interfed] Apr 2 notes / Apr 9 agenda, Cantor, Scott, 04/09/2013
      - Re: [inc-interfed] Apr 2 notes / Apr 9 agenda, Tom Scavo, 04/09/2013

List archive

Re: [inc-interfed] Apr 2 notes / Apr 9 agenda