per-entity - RE: [Per-Entity] Revisions to our final report

Subject: Per-Entity Metadata Working Group

List archive

RE: [Per-Entity] Revisions to our final report

From: "Cantor, Scott" <>
To: Thomas Lenggenhager <>, "Per-Entity Metadata Working Group" <>
Subject: RE: [Per-Entity] Revisions to our final report
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 13:44:46 +0000
Accept-language: en-US
Authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 164.107.81.216) smtp.mailfrom=osu.edu; incommon.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;incommon.org; dmarc=bestguesspass action=none header.from=osu.edu;
Ironport-phdr: 9a23:lwzpCBOsty/3BIcFiUcl6mtUPXoX/o7sNwtQ0KIMzox0KPv7rarrMEGX3/hxlliBBdydsK0UzbeN+Pm9EUU7or+/81k6OKRWUBEEjchE1ycBO+WiTXPBEfjxciYhF95DXlI2t1uyMExSBdqsLwaK+i76xXcoFx7+LQt4IPjuUs6X1pzvlrP6x5qGXwVPgTOmKZd/Khq5oAPRv8Ybm8M2Lqs3xRTEpHtBdOlM7Xh3JE6Yn1D35pH0tNRb/j4VlvQ99tJRGYD3Y600RKBRRAshKWM04sKjmgPEUBPFri8EX39TnxxUAhTUxBD8VZD0tyz88O1n13/JE9fxSOV+cj2k86BxDFfTgyAbK3RxpGrejNB3luQBiBW6ulpyz5OCM9LdD+Z3Yq6IJYBSfmFGRMsEEnUZWo4=
Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99

> I guess CDNs in combination with IP Anycast could be a suitable
> approach. The single IP Anycast address should avoid the issues with for
> Java and libcurl Scott brought up.

Sounds like Java's not a concern, at least not in Shibboleth's case. The SP
is pretty well set right now with IdP-only aggregates and no real discovery
fix to let us move to MDQ so I imagine we have some slack.

-- Scott

[Per-Entity] Revisions to our final report, David Walker, 10/14/2016
- Re: [Per-Entity] Revisions to our final report, Thomas Lenggenhager, 10/18/2016
  - RE: [Per-Entity] Revisions to our final report, Cantor, Scott, 10/18/2016
  - Re: [Per-Entity] Revisions to our final report, Scott Koranda, 10/21/2016
    - Re: [Per-Entity] Revisions to our final report, Thomas Lenggenhager, 10/25/2016

List archive

RE: [Per-Entity] Revisions to our final report