per-entity - Re: [Per-Entity] Revisions to our final report

Subject: Per-Entity Metadata Working Group

List archive

Re: [Per-Entity] Revisions to our final report

From: Thomas Lenggenhager <>
To: Per-Entity Metadata Working Group <>
Subject: Re: [Per-Entity] Revisions to our final report
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 10:46:43 +0200
Ironport-phdr: 9a23:heoUWRFLodBKykIsEPGO651GYnF86YWxBRYc798ds5kLTJ75pM6wAkXT6L1XgUPTWs2DsrQf1LqQ7vurADFIyK3CmU5BWaQEbwUCh8QSkl5oK+++Imq/EsTXaTcnFt9JTl5v8iLzG0FUHMHjew+a+SXqvnY6Uy/yPgttJ+nzBpWaz4Huj7jzqNXvZFBwiSD4TLVuLQmn5SDcqsAaiJdrYpk20BjIpHQAVP5R2HsgcUqehVPx4Nux4I9L8iJbvPck8MgGVr/1KfcWV7tdWQgmNGU8/4XPuB/MQgaJ5nITX39exh5FBQfK4Rf6V5j8qAPhqeth0yncNs2gHuN8Yiir86o+EEygsywALTNstTiP0sE=
Organization: SWITCH

I guess CDNs in combination with IP Anycast could be a suitable approach. The single IP Anycast address should avoid the issues with for Java and libcurl Scott brought up.

A quick Google search provided the following three CDNs that offer IP Anycast:
https://blog.cloudflare.com/a-brief-anycast-primer/
https://www.maxcdn.com/blog/anycast-ip-routing-used-maxcdn/
https://www.keycdn.com/support/anycast/

What do you think about this approach?

Thomas

On 15.10.16 00:00, David Walker wrote:

o We are not recommending CDNs as strongly as we once were, so the
presentation of CDN distribution and "traditional" distribution
is more even.

--
SWITCH
------
Thomas Lenggenhager, Central Solutions
Werdstrasse 2, P.O. Box, 8021 Zurich, Switzerland
phone +41 44 268 1505 direct +41 44 268 1541
https://www.switch.ch

[Per-Entity] Revisions to our final report, David Walker, 10/14/2016
- Re: [Per-Entity] Revisions to our final report, Thomas Lenggenhager, 10/18/2016
  - RE: [Per-Entity] Revisions to our final report, Cantor, Scott, 10/18/2016
  - Re: [Per-Entity] Revisions to our final report, Scott Koranda, 10/21/2016
    - Re: [Per-Entity] Revisions to our final report, Thomas Lenggenhager, 10/25/2016

List archive

Re: [Per-Entity] Revisions to our final report