Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

per-entity - RE: [Per-Entity] distribution of aggregate metadata

Subject: Per-Entity Metadata Working Group

List archive

RE: [Per-Entity] distribution of aggregate metadata


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Cantor, Scott" <>
  • To: Tom Scavo <>, Per-Entity Metadata Working Group <>
  • Subject: RE: [Per-Entity] distribution of aggregate metadata
  • Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 18:12:54 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 164.107.81.220) smtp.mailfrom=osu.edu; incommon.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;incommon.org; dmarc=bestguesspass action=none header.from=osu.edu;
  • Ironport-phdr: 9a23:d5yxChY8hYIhgqC/bcmqLcn/LSx+4OfEezUN459isYplN5qZpcm9bnLW6fgltlLVR4KTs6sC0LWG9f27EjVdqb+681k8M7V0HycfjssXmwFySOWkMmbcaMDQUiohAc5ZX0Vk9XzoeWJcGcL5ekGA6ibqtW1aMlzFOAF0PuX4HJLJx4Tyjrjqus6bXwIduD24KYh5JQux5VHNrNIdiJVlAqc31hbTpHZUIaJbyX4+YRqrkgy5y8Gs/YJyuwFdp/st/tJJGZr9Zac5S7MQIy4hLnh9sNXmr1zOSxeO+mo0U2MdlR9NBA6D6wv1CMTfqCz/46BW0S+GOteyBYs/Xii+pe8/QxbulCAdcWQR93rKzMF8kfQI81qauxVjztuMM8muP/1kc/aYJItCSA==
  • Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
  • Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
> I think there would have to be some real benefit (not just experience
> gained) before we would consider doing that. From where I sit, the
> current distribution method Just Works (TM) so I have to turn around
> and ask InCommon deployers: Is there something about the current
> distribution method that is suboptimal or not working for you (apart
> from the size of the aggregate of course)?

I don't think the point was to help us (and nobody is suggesting the URL
would change), so if Ops doesn't think incorporating a cloud/CDN delivery
strategy under cover of a name controlled by InCommon is a useful step for
its own MDQ direction-setting, I don't think any of us would motivate it.

-- Scott


Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page