Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

per-entity - [Per-Entity] distribution of aggregate metadata

Subject: Per-Entity Metadata Working Group

List archive

[Per-Entity] distribution of aggregate metadata


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Tom Scavo <>
  • To: Per-Entity Metadata Working Group <>
  • Subject: [Per-Entity] distribution of aggregate metadata
  • Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 14:03:55 -0400
  • Ironport-phdr: 9a23:4ZVjuxVvWt873D0iywLvYgb1mAfV8LGtZVwlr6E/grcLSJyIuqrYZhaGt8tkgFKBZ4jH8fUM07OQ6P+wHzFbqs/c+Fk5M7VyFDY9wf0MmAIhBMPXQWbaF9XNKxIAIcJZSVV+9Gu6O0UGUOz3ZlnVv2HgpWVKQka3HUNPK+/0Ao/fidisn6D3osWLIlYAuD3oWb5oaTiwsQTNp4EzjJdrJq8tw1P2pWFLeuJZjUxyIk+L10Lk69318Zh/8jhBk/Mn/MlFVKL8OaMiQuoLIi4hNjUJ48ijjhLKUwzHsmcGSW4fjB1gAg7Z4Qv8U4ur9Cb2q7wui2GhIcTqQOVsCnyZ5KBxRUqt0X9fOg==

I have an action item to assess the costs and risks associated with
splitting the aggregate. In the meantime, the following question was
posed in the agenda:

Could Ops gain experience by moving current aggregate delivery (or a
fraction) into cloud?

I think there would have to be some real benefit (not just experience
gained) before we would consider doing that. From where I sit, the
current distribution method Just Works (TM) so I have to turn around
and ask InCommon deployers: Is there something about the current
distribution method that is suboptimal or not working for you (apart
from the size of the aggregate of course)?

That's a real question :-)

Tom



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page