per-entity - Re: [Per-Entity] Does MDQ with single entity signing result in shorter usage periods for the signing key?
Subject: Per-Entity Metadata Working Group
List archive
Re: [Per-Entity] Does MDQ with single entity signing result in shorter usage periods for the signing key?
Chronological Thread
- From: Ian Young <>
- To: Thomas Lenggenhager <>
- Cc: Per-Entity Metadata Working Group <>
- Subject: Re: [Per-Entity] Does MDQ with single entity signing result in shorter usage periods for the signing key?
- Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2016 10:08:13 +0100
> On 4 Aug 2016, at 09:19, Ian Young
> <>
> wrote:
>
> If there *was* a potential for a chosen plaintext attack
s/chosen/known/
Sorry about that.
-- Ian
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
- [Per-Entity] Does MDQ with single entity signing result in shorter usage periods for the signing key?, Thomas Lenggenhager, 08/04/2016
- Re: [Per-Entity] Does MDQ with single entity signing result in shorter usage periods for the signing key?, Ian Young, 08/04/2016
- Re: [Per-Entity] Does MDQ with single entity signing result in shorter usage periods for the signing key?, Ian Young, 08/04/2016
- Re: [Per-Entity] Does MDQ with single entity signing result in shorter usage periods for the signing key?, Thomas Lenggenhager, 08/04/2016
- RE: [Per-Entity] Does MDQ with single entity signing result in shorter usage periods for the signing key?, Cantor, Scott, 08/04/2016
- Re: [Per-Entity] Does MDQ with single entity signing result in shorter usage periods for the signing key?, Thomas Lenggenhager, 08/04/2016
- Re: [Per-Entity] Does MDQ with single entity signing result in shorter usage periods for the signing key?, Ian Young, 08/04/2016
- Re: [Per-Entity] Does MDQ with single entity signing result in shorter usage periods for the signing key?, Ian Young, 08/04/2016
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.