per-entity - [Per-Entity] Does MDQ with single entity signing result in shorter usage periods for the signing key?
Subject: Per-Entity Metadata Working Group
List archive
[Per-Entity] Does MDQ with single entity signing result in shorter usage periods for the signing key?
Chronological Thread
- From: Thomas Lenggenhager <>
- To: Per-Entity Metadata Working Group <>
- Subject: [Per-Entity] Does MDQ with single entity signing result in shorter usage periods for the signing key?
- Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2016 08:22:07 +0200
- Organization: SWITCH
If I remember correctly from what I once learned in a cryptography class: The more signed material you produce with a key the easier it gets to attack it.
MDQ with single entity signing would heavily increase the number of signed documents publicly accessible. Do we therefore need to shorten the usage period of the metadata signing key?
Who knows more about this topic?
Is that something we need to consider before deploying?
Thomas
NB: SWITCHaai metadata signing would not be affected much since we use a dedicated PKI for it. We replace the signing key at least every three years. The trust root configured in most entities is the twenty years valid root CA certificate of the dedicated PKI, stored in a safe. Entities other than Shibboleth that usually do not support PKI for metadata verification need to configure the intermediate CA certificate as trust root and replace it every five years when we replace that one:
https://www.switch.ch/pki/aai/
--
SWITCH
------
Thomas Lenggenhager, Central Solutions
Werdstrasse 2, P.O. Box, 8021 Zurich, Switzerland
phone +41 44 268 1505 direct +41 44 268 1541
https://www.switch.ch
- [Per-Entity] Does MDQ with single entity signing result in shorter usage periods for the signing key?, Thomas Lenggenhager, 08/04/2016
- Re: [Per-Entity] Does MDQ with single entity signing result in shorter usage periods for the signing key?, Ian Young, 08/04/2016
- Re: [Per-Entity] Does MDQ with single entity signing result in shorter usage periods for the signing key?, Ian Young, 08/04/2016
- Re: [Per-Entity] Does MDQ with single entity signing result in shorter usage periods for the signing key?, Thomas Lenggenhager, 08/04/2016
- RE: [Per-Entity] Does MDQ with single entity signing result in shorter usage periods for the signing key?, Cantor, Scott, 08/04/2016
- Re: [Per-Entity] Does MDQ with single entity signing result in shorter usage periods for the signing key?, Thomas Lenggenhager, 08/04/2016
- Re: [Per-Entity] Does MDQ with single entity signing result in shorter usage periods for the signing key?, Ian Young, 08/04/2016
- Re: [Per-Entity] Does MDQ with single entity signing result in shorter usage periods for the signing key?, Ian Young, 08/04/2016
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.