Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

mfa-interop - [MFA-Interop] RE: A thought about the "basic" profile

Subject: MFA Interop Working Group

List archive

[MFA-Interop] RE: A thought about the "basic" profile


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Cantor, Scott" <>
  • To: "" <>
  • Subject: [MFA-Interop] RE: A thought about the "basic" profile
  • Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 16:19:56 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 164.107.81.208) smtp.mailfrom=osu.edu; incommon.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;incommon.org; dmarc=bestguesspass action=none header.from=osu.edu;
  • Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
  • Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
Actually I guess the use case was to be able to prefer MFA but also indicate
you were ok with something/anything else? In which case...never mind. ;-)

-- Scott

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cantor, Scott
> Sent: Monday, June 13, 2016 12:18 PM
> To:
>
> Subject: A thought about the "basic" profile
>
> You know, nothing really breaks if you request an "unspecified"
> AuthenticationContext in SAML. Shibboleth just ignores it. I doubt much of
> anything else that even honors AC properly would care (and if they did, it
> would be just as much work to support as "basic").
>
> So...does that gets us out of bothering with it?
>
> Just looking for optimizations...
>
> -- Scott


Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page