mfa-interop - [MFA-Interop] Re: A thought about the "basic" profile
Subject: MFA Interop Working Group
List archive
- From: "Cantor, Scott" <>
- To: Eric Goodman <>, "" <>
- Subject: [MFA-Interop] Re: A thought about the "basic" profile
- Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 16:48:08 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
- Authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 164.107.81.222) smtp.mailfrom=osu.edu; incommon.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;incommon.org; dmarc=bestguesspass action=none header.from=osu.edu;
- Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
- Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
On 6/13/16, 12:27 PM, "Eric Goodman"
<>
wrote:
>I thought you were originally suggesting literally "unspecified", as in
I was, but it only "works" if it's by itself, not combining it with something
else. It just gets dropped, so that would be equivalent to only requesting
MFA, which isn't what you want.
-- Scott
>
> <samlp:RequestedAuthnContext Comparison="exact">
> <saml:AuthnContextClassRef>
> http://id.incommon.org/assurance/mfa
> </saml:AuthnContextClassRef>
> <saml:AuthnContextClassRef>
> unspecified
> </saml:AuthnContextClassRef>
> </samlp:RequestedAuthnContext>
- [MFA-Interop] RE: A thought about the "basic" profile, Cantor, Scott, 06/13/2016
- [MFA-Interop] RE: A thought about the "basic" profile, Eric Goodman, 06/13/2016
- [MFA-Interop] Re: A thought about the "basic" profile, Cantor, Scott, 06/13/2016
- [MFA-Interop] RE: A thought about the "basic" profile, Eric Goodman, 06/13/2016
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.