mfa-interop - [MFA-Interop] A thought about the "basic" profile
Subject: MFA Interop Working Group
List archive
- From: "Cantor, Scott" <>
- To: "" <>
- Subject: [MFA-Interop] A thought about the "basic" profile
- Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 16:18:05 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
- Authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 164.107.81.214) smtp.mailfrom=osu.edu; incommon.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;incommon.org; dmarc=bestguesspass action=none header.from=osu.edu;
- Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
- Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
You know, nothing really breaks if you request an "unspecified"
AuthenticationContext in SAML. Shibboleth just ignores it. I doubt much of
anything else that even honors AC properly would care (and if they did, it
would be just as much work to support as "basic").
So...does that gets us out of bothering with it?
Just looking for optimizations...
-- Scott
- [MFA-Interop] A thought about the "basic" profile, Cantor, Scott, 06/13/2016
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.