Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

metadata-support - Re: [Metadata-Support] Re: conflicting metadata requirements from InCommon

Subject: InCommon metadata support

List archive

Re: [Metadata-Support] Re: conflicting metadata requirements from InCommon


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Nick Roy <>
  • To: "" <>
  • Subject: Re: [Metadata-Support] Re: conflicting metadata requirements from InCommon
  • Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 21:46:38 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) ;
  • Ironport-phdr: 9a23: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
  • Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
  • Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99

All fixed, thanks!

Nick

On 3/22/18 4:28 PM, Andrew Morgan wrote:
> Thanks for the clarification and documentation update!
>
> Andy
>
>
> On Thu, 22 Mar 2018, Nick Roy wrote:
>
>> Yes, Chris is correct. I will fix the documentation so it does not
>> require base64 encoding for URLs.
>>
>> Nick
>>
>> On 3/22/18 2:56 PM, Christopher Bongaarts wrote:
>>> On 3/22/2018 3:45 PM, Andrew Morgan wrote:
>>>> I have our logo in 80x60 PNG format. I have created a base64-encoded
>>>> version of it. When I place the base64-encoded file on my IDP's web
>>>> server, my browser is unable to display the image. Here are 3
>>>> different versions of the image:
>>>>
>>>> https://login.oregonstate.edu/images/osu-small.png
>>>> - the original image file
>>>> - file reports "PNG image data, 80 x 60, 8-bit/color RGBA,
>>>> non-interlaced"
>>>>
>>>> https://login.oregonstate.edu/images/osu-small-b64.png
>>>> - base64 encoded
>>>> - file reports "ASCII text, with very long lines"
>>>>
>>>> https://login.oregonstate.edu/images/osu-small-b64-inline.png
>>>> - base64 encoded and prefixed with "data:image/png;base64,"
>>>> - file reports "ASCII text, with very long lines"
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What is the right way to meet the base64-encoded recommendation? Does
>>>> base64 encoding only apply when using an inline Data URI element?
>>> The first one, and yes.
>>>
>>> --
>>> %% Christopher A. Bongaarts %%
>>>
>>> %%
>>> %% OIT - Identity Management %% http://umn.edu/~cab %%
>>> %% University of Minnesota %% +1 (612) 625-1809 %%
>>>




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page