Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

metadata-support - RE: [Metadata-Support] port numbers in metadata

Subject: InCommon metadata support

List archive

RE: [Metadata-Support] port numbers in metadata

Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Cantor, Scott" <>
  • To: "" <>
  • Subject: RE: [Metadata-Support] port numbers in metadata
  • Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2016 15:48:25 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is;; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;; dmarc=bestguesspass action=none;
  • Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
  • Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99

> I was actually thinking more about the renegotiation issues. Most of the
> people who were doing front and back channel on port 443 in the UK
> federation ended up migrating away from that configuration (just four
left, I
> think).

Yes, because of the TLS issues. There's no client TLS if you want to use the
front channel, it kicks on message level for you and your web server doesn't
get told to try and get a client cert.

-- Scott

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page