metadata-support - Re: [Metadata-Support] port numbers in metadata
Subject: InCommon metadata support
List archive
- From: Ian Young <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [Metadata-Support] port numbers in metadata
- Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2016 16:43:49 +0100
> On 7 Jul 2016, at 14:39, Cantor, Scott
> <>
> wrote:
>
> That's pretty much over now, sort of. We certainly have no documentation
> about it, but the IdP and SP now are both equipped to operate cleanly over
> port 443 for SOAP messaging by turning on signing and encryption
> automatically, at least if one accepts that as a viable security model (and
> the rest of the world certainly does).
I was actually thinking more about the renegotiation issues. Most of the
people who were doing front and back channel on port 443 in the UK federation
ended up migrating away from that configuration (just four left, I think).
-- Ian
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
- [Metadata-Support] port numbers in metadata, Tom Scavo, 07/07/2016
- Re: [Metadata-Support] port numbers in metadata, Ian Young, 07/07/2016
- RE: [Metadata-Support] port numbers in metadata, Cantor, Scott, 07/07/2016
- Re: [Metadata-Support] port numbers in metadata, Ian Young, 07/07/2016
- RE: [Metadata-Support] port numbers in metadata, Cantor, Scott, 07/07/2016
- Re: [Metadata-Support] port numbers in metadata, Ian Young, 07/07/2016
- RE: [Metadata-Support] port numbers in metadata, Cantor, Scott, 07/07/2016
- Re: [Metadata-Support] port numbers in metadata, Ian Young, 07/07/2016
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.