InC-Lib-Vendor

[Dean Woodbeck <>]

OK -- I've incorporated the changes (I think I got them all). I made all 
of the questions required. Let me know of any changes/additions/corrections.

http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=wGlEYsyiVnJgw01abx28xQ_3d_3d
Thanks,

Dean

Andy Ingham wrote:
> Yes, that's a nuance I didn't appreciate.  Question 3 would ALWAYS be 
> presented (wouldn't be conditional on 2) and some rewording would be 
> needed.
>
> Andy
>
> Ann West wrote:
> > Andy,
> >
> > One comment below:
> >
> > > > > Do we care if several people from an institution complete the 
> > > > > survey and possibly provide conflicting answers? 
> > > > I think we do care. I would think we would want only one response 
> > > > per institution. Not sure how we police that, other than stating so 
> > > > in the email that we'll send out, as well as in the survey intro text.
> > > I'M NOT SURE IF DISAGREEMENT AT THIS STAGE OR IN THIS CONTEXT IS A 
> > > BAD THING.  SINCE THE RESULTS ARE RELATIVELY "PRIVATE" (THEY ARE, 
> > > AREN'T THEY?), CONFLICTING ANSWERS AT LEAST PROVIDE AN OPPORTUNITY 
> > > FOR FOLKS AT A GIVEN CAMPUS TO DISCUSS LOCALLY AMONGST THEMSELVES 
> > > (PRESUMABLY, THE UPSIDE IS THAT WE'D KNOW AT LEAST WHO NEEDS TO TALK 
> > > TO WHOM!)
> >
> > Then we should ask for a contact name as a requirement so we know who 
> > to connect with whom?
> >
> > Ann