InC-Lib-Vendor

[Andy Ingham <>]

MY COMMENTS IN ALL CAPS BELOW

Dean Woodbeck wrote:

> > Do we care if several people from an institution complete the survey 
> > and possibly provide conflicting answers? 
>
> I think we do care. I would think we would want only one response per 
> institution. Not sure how we police that, other than stating so in the 
> email that we'll send out, as well as in the survey intro text. Other 
> thoughts?

I'M NOT SURE IF DISAGREEMENT AT THIS STAGE OR IN THIS CONTEXT IS A BAD 
THING.  SINCE THE RESULTS ARE RELATIVELY "PRIVATE" (THEY ARE, AREN'T 
THEY?), CONFLICTING ANSWERS AT LEAST PROVIDE AN OPPORTUNITY FOR FOLKS AT 
A GIVEN CAMPUS TO DISCUSS LOCALLY AMONGST THEMSELVES (PRESUMABLY, THE 
UPSIDE IS THAT WE'D KNOW AT LEAST WHO NEEDS TO TALK TO WHOM!)


> > I assume this will be send to the InC Participants as well as the InC 
> > Library list. Are there others?

THESE MAKE SENSE TO ME.

> > Should we provide a link to the InC Library page for background and/or 
> > a link to InCommon?
>
> Maybe a link back to the vendor subgroup page for background?

YES

Andy