Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

idpaas - Feedback requested: IdPaaS survey

Subject: IdP as a Service Working Group

List archive

Feedback requested: IdPaaS survey


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Mary McKee <>
  • To: "" <>
  • Subject: Feedback requested: IdPaaS survey
  • Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 20:08:08 +0000
  • Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1;spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=duke.edu;dmarc=pass action=none header.from=duke.edu;dkim=pass header.d=duke.edu;arc=none
  • Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=huUjAB9TX3yX1SCyZPpWXdWiebKEy1eS2YIwlfkZ1aI=; b=ZBeao0VKpVhTYLJdS0FmQDA6I62k7q6eoNwjYyoJZpdKw9evUi94OT97pxP9ycZ/PWAa14Ji6DjNF0VMM5PSocULWBYe2Dn0sP67IgsPjZcFM5BEi6JRJPj23EFOn/DU6VwK9oh/xkWt+FbIJ76xmHCoFVDdgXYz2372ILQo0Znp8nSZgGxILMyA739fBHB4wE2WGLUSvdRY2U+RQhZxv015dQ1qHZ79SgmRn/WpYx76Lt0Pig97cEjUHeQ0pB5TkpniLOyDXn7JNiqO5/lkOHB58B4Dq9PPK1q5wriyEUCOIylexkzLFJHpL/hAYFJxDVQfFt69DXCdbNFJ+kOaLQ==
  • Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=NFxMKmM6ETdJvGFDeNXelYXDAzWzeSbHQKOO5bmfycA/mHPhBpRF6l5P55fAzXjxfgc4MtwzFvXD57qqPhxgpLivotQDm3FFbQxUmvRegrDvbHEeW02cJXKOy2wqYY29xYrY/Yo2sLM2bWga/LzxcfyyhtlvnrS77mmrKSKGqWy+9BA3DC6MnM35IfzirUcurlEDxDX1Ox77VEUla4E1tlBCywGvBTExIzZKcx3nbUrPfKbXkngrqARLUmA40I2H+yCw6rBTtb3dexUgbyrQHEZ27BTsP5GjEaAaMCvcOANBoHE9FPeCbMBWRla5xFmZpRArsduEVEd/1TeRAwl8+w==

Hi all,

Please see below for a working survey (thanks to E.J. and Duquesne for hosting!): 


As discussed on our calls, this survey is dynamic to minimize irrelevant questions (e.g., it asks you what factors are preventing you from joining InCommon or another federation only if you indicate that you are not currently a member, but are interested).  Please let us know by Thursday, July 18th if you would like to recommend any changes to the survey.

For distribution, I would like to propose that we send this out in two waves - first to senior IT leadership groups, and subsequently to a wider distribution (such as the Educause list).  I think it would be useful to compare/contrast any concerns or priorities identified by senior leadership vs. other technical staff, as it will be important to consider both perspectives in recommendations moving forward.  

By our next call, I expect to have some data we can share from the first distribution, so our discussion can be focused around 1) results so far, 2) how to share raw data with the group for further analysis/inquiry, and 3) distribution of the second wave of surveys.  The data we collect from this exercise will factor into every one of this group's deliverables, so we'd really like to make sure that development, distribution, and analysis of the results is a team effort.

As always, we appreciate your engagement and welcome your feedback!
Mary





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page