Meeting the InCommon Assurance profile criteria using Active Directory

[Ron Thielen <>]

Thumb(s) up

 

From: [mailto:] On Behalf Of Rank, Mark
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2013 10:27 AM
To:
Subject: RE: [AD-Assurance] Quick question about sharing of AD Assurance group work...

 

Thanks Ann and Michael...

 

Mark

 

 

--------------------------------------------------

Mark Rank
Project Manager - Identity & Access Mgt

UCSF Information Technology Services (ITS)
email:

phn:414-331-1476

--------------------------------------------------

---

From: [] on behalf of Michael W. Brogan []
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2013 2:22 PM
To:
Subject: RE: [AD-Assurance] Quick question about sharing of AD Assurance group work...

+1

 

From: [] On Behalf Of Ann West
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2013 2:14 PM
To:
Subject: Re: [AD-Assurance] Quick question about sharing of AD Assurance group work...

 

+1

 

 

 

From: <Rank>, "Rank, Mark" <>
Reply-To: "" <>
Date: Wednesday, June 5, 2013 3:57 PM
To: "" <>
Subject: RE: [AD-Assurance] Quick question about sharing of AD Assurance group work...

 

David:

 

Thanks, yep... that disclaimer was implicit in my proposal. Others?

 

Mark

 

 

--------------------------------------------------

Mark Rank
Project Manager - Identity & Access Mgt

UCSF Information Technology Services (ITS)
email:

phn:414-331-1476

--------------------------------------------------

---

From: [] on behalf of David Walker []
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2013 12:54 PM
To:
Subject: Re: [AD-Assurance] Quick question about sharing of AD Assurance group work...

I say it's OK to discuss preliminary findings/thoughts as long as you make it clear they're preliminary. (I hope others agree, as I've already done this).

David

On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 19:00 +0000, Rank, Mark wrote:

Folks:

I wanted to run something by the group. I have been invited to a discussion on Friday (after our call) at the Berkeley campus to talk with team that supports the AD DS environment there.

I don't remember if we talked much about distribution outside the group. My inclination would be anything in the restricted area should not be redistributed until the group is ready for release. Would the group be OK with me verbally talking about our preliminary findings?

Let me know your thoughts. I think it will be fine either way. We can discuss at the call if needed otherwise folks can just weigh in via email. I will assume silence is consent.

Please advise,
Mark

--------------------------------------------------
Mark Rank
Project Manager - Identity & Access Mgt
UCSF Information Technology Services (ITS)
email:
phn:414-331-1476
--------------------------------------------------