technical-discuss - Re: [InC-Technical] InCommon Baseline Expectations Metadata Requirements
Subject: InCommon Technical Discussions
List archive
- From: "Cantor, Scott" <>
- To: Nick Roy <>, "" <>
- Subject: Re: [InC-Technical] InCommon Baseline Expectations Metadata Requirements
- Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 20:58:58 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
- Ironport-phdr: 9a23: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
- Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
- Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
> RECOMMENDED:
>
> SSL certificates on endpoints are valid
That seems like a slippery slope: valid re: dates? Specific CAs? Key sizes?
What about ciphers, or use of TLS 1.0, etc.?
Requiring a logo is, I think, underspecified, we should mandate specific
size(s).
I'd like to see errorURL be required with guidance around what should be
behind it.
-- Scott
- [InC-Technical] InCommon Baseline Expectations Metadata Requirements, Nick Roy, 11/08/2017
- Re: [InC-Technical] InCommon Baseline Expectations Metadata Requirements, Nick Roy, 11/08/2017
- Re: [InC-Technical] InCommon Baseline Expectations Metadata Requirements, Cantor, Scott, 11/08/2017
- Re: [InC-Technical] InCommon Baseline Expectations Metadata Requirements, Nick Roy, 11/08/2017
- Re: [InC-Technical] InCommon Baseline Expectations Metadata Requirements, Cantor, Scott, 11/08/2017
- Re: [InC-Technical] InCommon Baseline Expectations Metadata Requirements, Rhys Smith, 11/08/2017
- Re: [InC-Technical] InCommon Baseline Expectations Metadata Requirements, Alan Buxey, 11/09/2017
- Re: [InC-Technical] InCommon Baseline Expectations Metadata Requirements, Rhys Smith, 11/09/2017
- Re: [InC-Technical] InCommon Baseline Expectations Metadata Requirements, Alan Buxey, 11/09/2017
- Re: [InC-Technical] InCommon Baseline Expectations Metadata Requirements, Alan Buxey, 11/09/2017
- Re: [InC-Technical] InCommon Baseline Expectations Metadata Requirements, Rhys Smith, 11/08/2017
- Re: [InC-Technical] InCommon Baseline Expectations Metadata Requirements, Cantor, Scott, 11/08/2017
- Re: [InC-Technical] InCommon Baseline Expectations Metadata Requirements, Scott Koranda, 11/09/2017
- RE: [InC-Technical] InCommon Baseline Expectations Metadata Requirements, Cantor, Scott, 11/09/2017
- Re: [InC-Technical] InCommon Baseline Expectations Metadata Requirements, David Langenberg, 11/09/2017
- RE: [InC-Technical] InCommon Baseline Expectations Metadata Requirements, Farmer, Jacob, 11/09/2017
- Re: [InC-Technical] InCommon Baseline Expectations Metadata Requirements, Nick Roy, 11/08/2017
- Re: [InC-Technical] InCommon Baseline Expectations Metadata Requirements, Cantor, Scott, 11/08/2017
- Re: [InC-Technical] InCommon Baseline Expectations Metadata Requirements, Nick Roy, 11/08/2017
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.