per-entity - Re: [Per-Entity] adding a layer to the security model

Subject: Per-Entity Metadata Working Group

List archive

Re: [Per-Entity] adding a layer to the security model

From: Nick Roy <>
To: <>
Subject: Re: [Per-Entity] adding a layer to the security model
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 11:32:07 -0600
Authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) ;
Ironport-phdr: 9a23:oWgIPxZxTms8bmZUv5zNgzr/LSx+4OfEezUN459isYplN5qZpsq7bnLW6fgltlLVR4KTs6sC0LWG9f27EjVdqb+681k8M7V0HycfjssXmwFySOWkMmbcaMDQUiohAc5ZX0Vk9XzoeWJcGcL5ekGA6ibqtW1aSV3DMl8hPunvX4PUk8Wrxsiz/ZbUZgBPgny6e7wkfzusqgCEkMgdgsNYLbd5nh3TpWpgeuJKyHluKE7J2Rvw+5Hjr9ZY7y1Mtqd5pIZ7WqLgcvFgQA==
Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99

application/x-saml-jose-signed

On 9/21/16 11:08 AM, Cantor, Scott wrote:

On 9/21/16, 1:06 PM,
"
on behalf of Tom Scavo"
<
on behalf of
>
wrote:

Ah, so I *did* misunderstand you. I think you're suggesting we publish
JSON format metadata in addition to XML. I don't disagree with that.
It overlaps with conversations we've had regarding JSON feeds for
discovery.

I'm not referring to the format of the metadata, just the signing format.

-- Scott

[Per-Entity] adding a layer to the security model, Tom Scavo, 09/21/2016
- Re: [Per-Entity] adding a layer to the security model, Cantor, Scott, 09/21/2016
  - Re: [Per-Entity] adding a layer to the security model, Tom Scavo, 09/21/2016
    - Re: [Per-Entity] adding a layer to the security model, Cantor, Scott, 09/21/2016
      - Re: [Per-Entity] adding a layer to the security model, Tom Scavo, 09/21/2016
        
        Re: [Per-Entity] adding a layer to the security model, Cantor, Scott, 09/21/2016
        
        Re: [Per-Entity] adding a layer to the security model, Nick Roy, 09/21/2016

List archive

Re: [Per-Entity] adding a layer to the security model