per-entity - Re: [Per-Entity] adding a layer to the security model

Subject: Per-Entity Metadata Working Group

List archive

Re: [Per-Entity] adding a layer to the security model

From: "Cantor, Scott" <>
To: Tom Scavo <>
Cc: Per-Entity Metadata Working Group <>
Subject: Re: [Per-Entity] adding a layer to the security model
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 17:08:57 +0000
Accept-language: en-US
Authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 164.107.81.212) smtp.mailfrom=osu.edu; incommon.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;incommon.org; dmarc=bestguesspass action=none header.from=osu.edu;
Ironport-phdr: 9a23:xajAcBEPY+Mv1o9kjFUTNp1GYnF86YWxBRYc798ds5kLTJ76rsqwAkXT6L1XgUPTWs2DsrQf1LqQ7vurADFIyK3CmU5BWaQEbwUCh8QSkl5oK+++Imq/EsTXaTcnFt9JTl5v8iLzG0FUHMHjew+a+SXqvnY6Uy/yPgttJ+nzBpWaz4Huj7jzqNXvZFB0gz/1Wrh7MhL++RnLrcIfn4xKK6AtxwHPr2cSPela2DU7C0iUmkO2zc624Jl5t2xrsPU964QIBa7zebg/V/oCJDM9LiY46NC95kqLdheG+nZJCjZeqRFPGQWQqUiiBpo=
Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99

On 9/21/16, 1:06 PM,
"
on behalf of Tom Scavo"
<
on behalf of
>
wrote:

> Ah, so I *did* misunderstand you. I think you're suggesting we publish
> JSON format metadata in addition to XML. I don't disagree with that.
> It overlaps with conversations we've had regarding JSON feeds for
> discovery.

I'm not referring to the format of the metadata, just the signing format.

-- Scott

[Per-Entity] adding a layer to the security model, Tom Scavo, 09/21/2016
- Re: [Per-Entity] adding a layer to the security model, Cantor, Scott, 09/21/2016
  - Re: [Per-Entity] adding a layer to the security model, Tom Scavo, 09/21/2016
    - Re: [Per-Entity] adding a layer to the security model, Cantor, Scott, 09/21/2016
      - Re: [Per-Entity] adding a layer to the security model, Tom Scavo, 09/21/2016
        
        Re: [Per-Entity] adding a layer to the security model, Cantor, Scott, 09/21/2016
        
        Re: [Per-Entity] adding a layer to the security model, Nick Roy, 09/21/2016

List archive

Re: [Per-Entity] adding a layer to the security model