Per-Entity Metadata Working Group

[Tom Scavo <>]

On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 6:51 PM, Scott Koranda 
<>
 wrote:
>
> [...]
> If anyone disagrees with that simple analysis please let me
> know.

I don't disagree but...

> The continued discussion on latency and gathering more numbers
> and more data is fine, but I don't see that they change
> anything about the approach we will recommend.
>
> Again, if anyone disagrees please say so, but my conclusion
> after seeing the numbers and understanding how clients will
> cache (per our earlier discussions) is that an InCommon MDQ
> service built on a commercial CDN is going to work well.

I'm not convinced the CDN layer is necessary. My initial timings
suggest the CDN does not provide huge benefit beyond what mdq-beta
alone can provide. More testing is needed, however.

Tom