per-entity - Re: [Per-Entity] distribution of aggregate metadata

Subject: Per-Entity Metadata Working Group

List archive

Re: [Per-Entity] distribution of aggregate metadata

From: "Cantor, Scott" <>
To: IJ Kim <>
Cc: Nick Roy <>, Chris Phillips <>, Per-Entity Metadata Working Group <>
Subject: Re: [Per-Entity] distribution of aggregate metadata
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 16:41:47 +0000
Accept-language: en-US
Authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 164.107.81.216) smtp.mailfrom=osu.edu; canarie.ca; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;canarie.ca; dmarc=bestguesspass action=none header.from=osu.edu;
Ironport-phdr: 9a23:7hKL7hATz7NFC5k3MIFcUyQJP3N1i/DPJgcQr6AfoPdwSP3zr8bcNUDSrc9gkEXOFd2Crakb26yL6Ou5BCQp2tWojjMrSNR0TRgLiMEbzUQLIfWuLgnFFsPsdDEwB89YVVVorDmROElRH9viNRWJ+iXhpRZbIBj0NBJ0K+LpAcaSyp3vj6Hhs6HUNiRqzBm8ZPsmLReerAPNu9MQjJc4bKs9102ajGFPfrEc7mpuOVWJ217H7cCs4NQrpy9Zve4m7YgaeaLhYuI1QaEOX2duCHw8+MC+7UqLdgCI/HZJFzxOyhc=
Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99

On 8/12/16 12:02 PM, IJ Kim wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 06:03:28PM +0000, Cantor, Scott wrote:
>
> It occurs to me that running multiple mdq metadata providers wouldn't be
> too hard while I'm not sure if clients can chain them or can consume a
> second mdq provider with something like "backingMDQUrl". Achieving five
> 9s among these providers would be much feasible.

You can chain as many as desired, if the timeouts are short enough (and
they work, which is not a given with networking code).

-- Scott

RE: [Per-Entity] distribution of aggregate metadata, (continued)

List archive

Re: [Per-Entity] distribution of aggregate metadata