Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

per-entity - Re: [Per-Entity] distribution of aggregate metadata

Subject: Per-Entity Metadata Working Group

List archive

Re: [Per-Entity] distribution of aggregate metadata


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Walter Forbes Hoehn (wassa)" <>
  • To: Nick Roy <>
  • Cc: Scott Cantor <>, Chris Phillips <>, Per-Entity Metadata Working Group <>
  • Subject: Re: [Per-Entity] distribution of aggregate metadata
  • Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 18:46:49 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) ;
  • Ironport-phdr: 9a23:CVpb8Beul6qih/QIwe7NTHAWlGMj4u6mDksu8pMizoh2WeGdxc66Yx7h7PlgxGXEQZ/co6odzbGJ4+a9AidZvN6oizMrTt9lb1c9k8IYnggtUoauKHbQC7rUVRE8B9lIT1R//nu2YgB/Ecf6YEDO8DXptWZBUj22Dwd+J/z0F4jOlIz3krnqo9yAKzlP0Ry8arA6FhKn5VHXrM4HqYpkNqsrzBbV+D1Fd/kAlk1yIlfG1Sn14tu95tZN9D5atulp18lNUaOyP7sxVqdRTX5uZ388/9binRzOSBOP52BaX2kLxEkbSzPZ5Q33C8+i+hDxsfBwjWzDZZX7
  • Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
  • Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99

This has been my sense all along… design highest possible availability into
the server, but hedge with client features.

-WFH

> On Aug 11, 2016, at 1:38 PM, Nick Roy
> <>
> wrote:
>
>> On Aug 11, 2016, at 12:03 PM, Cantor, Scott
>> <>
>> wrote:
>>
>> I don't think I would be that concerned about basic CDN reliability in
>> practice, *if* we're caching on disk. Which we're not at present. So
>> that's really my take-away, that nobody by and large really believes
>> networks and CDNs can meet anything above 3-4 9s. and semi-regular but
>> unpredictable outages are inevitable.
>
> Thanks - that helps. So sounds like maybe we need to plan for caching on
> disk on the clients, and make that work with three nines of uptime. Is
> that something we can agree on?




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page