Per-Entity Metadata Working Group

[David Walker <>]

Agreed.  I was just trying to capture the sentiment of the discussion.  We'll dot i's, cross t's, and craft good language when we write our report.

David

On 08/05/2016 10:00 AM, Tom Scavo wrote:

On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 12:40 PM, David Walker  wrote:

It should not be overly difficult or costly for a federation to run the
entire per-entity infrastructure for its members.

Well, I think the sentiment is correct but different words are needed.
For one thing, it *will* be difficult and costly, otherwise we would
have done it already. Also, the phrase "entire per-entity
infrastructure" is confusing when taken out of context.

I think the point you're trying to make is: All that's needed on the
client side is a standard MDQ client (i.e., a client that conforms to
the MDQ protocol). InCommon will provide a complementary MDQ server
with the following features...

Tom

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature