per-entity - Re: [Per-Entity] implementing a cache on the client

Subject: Per-Entity Metadata Working Group

List archive

Re: [Per-Entity] implementing a cache on the client

From: David Walker <>
To: "Cantor, Scott" <>, "" <>
Subject: Re: [Per-Entity] implementing a cache on the client
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2016 10:02:26 -0700
Authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) ;
Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99

Well, yes, we need to verify these things. (I thought a phrase like "...should not be overly difficult or costly..." held enough weasel words to cover me. ;-) )

David

On 08/05/2016 09:46 AM, Cantor, Scott wrote:

On 8/5/16 12:40 PM, David Walker wrote:

Good discussion.  Have we reached consensus?  Here's a summary of where
I think we are:

  * It should not be overly difficult or costly for a federation to run
    the entire per-entity infrastructure for its members.

While I think we believe that's the outcome, I don't know that we as a
group have any actual proof of that, and part of our mandate is to
identify whether we think there's a risk of that not being true.

-- Scott

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [Per-Entity] implementing a cache on the client, (continued)

List archive

Re: [Per-Entity] implementing a cache on the client